quiet_tiger (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
quiet_tiger) wrote2005-07-15 12:21 am
quiet_tiger) wrote2005-07-15 12:21 am
Sexual Hell Level
(gakked from ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
roxymissrose)
NOT that I put much faith into Internet quizzes, because they're about as accurate as magazine quizzes and they're also everywhere, but I do have a couple questions about this one. Well, more comments, I suppose.
Just because I am not morally against something, doesn't mean I'll do it. Such as, the drug question. Just because I don't think it's "bad" persay to use drugs while having sex if that's something you enjoy, that doesn't mean I'm going to just break out the cocaine or something (ever see the pilot for Nip/Tuck?), so I don't really think that marking that one in that way should bring me closer to hell. Then again if I'm straightedge, I should probably be opposed to drug use at all, but then again part of being straightedge is tolerance for those different from you, at least, the part of it I consider myself to be. I hope that sentence makes sense.
And then, again, I hate things where I have to answer to one thing or the other, because so much in life is dependent on the situation. My friend had a board game where you had to answer if you would or would not do something, and you could answer "Depends" as well, and my friends kept getting mad that I kept saying that it would depend on the situation. Well, even things that seem clear-cut have gray areas. I think I just mixed my metaphors. That should be either things that are black and white or rough edges. Or something. Whatever. Consider the question about if it's wrong for a man to steal food to feed his starving family. Or Robin Hood. He was a thief, or, was he really just helping to redistribute the wealth? (the "rob from the rich, give to the poor" thing).
Also interesting was the question about having sex with someone who doesn't believe in God. Atheists need some love, too, you know. And we can cry out the Lord's name in vain without fear of repercussion. ;) They could have just kept it at "someone with a different faith."
Anyway, I'm really tired, it's 12:30am and I've been up since 5:30am, so I'm probably going to look back on this tomorrow and be like "wtf was I trying to say? I sound like I'm on crack."
roxymissrose)| HELL LEVEL 2 Raw score: 61% |
| You're just about as deep in sexual hellfire as a person can get. Virtually no urge, however demented, will go ungratified; practically no boundary will go uncrossed. You're probably proud of your adventurousness, and, honestly, you should be. Few people are confident enough to pursue pleasure on their own terms. Your morals could sink a bit further, sure, but it's mostly likely that you've got a pretty good idea of what you're into and what you would do...above you're honest with yourself with what you want. If more people told the truth, you'd have a lot more company down in the flames. AVOID: the lost souls in sexual heaven and (above all) the denizens of sexual purgatory. You don't need any prudes or wishy-washers in your life. |
 |
My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
| Link: The Sexual HELL Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid |
NOT that I put much faith into Internet quizzes, because they're about as accurate as magazine quizzes and they're also everywhere, but I do have a couple questions about this one. Well, more comments, I suppose.
Just because I am not morally against something, doesn't mean I'll do it. Such as, the drug question. Just because I don't think it's "bad" persay to use drugs while having sex if that's something you enjoy, that doesn't mean I'm going to just break out the cocaine or something (ever see the pilot for Nip/Tuck?), so I don't really think that marking that one in that way should bring me closer to hell. Then again if I'm straightedge, I should probably be opposed to drug use at all, but then again part of being straightedge is tolerance for those different from you, at least, the part of it I consider myself to be. I hope that sentence makes sense.
And then, again, I hate things where I have to answer to one thing or the other, because so much in life is dependent on the situation. My friend had a board game where you had to answer if you would or would not do something, and you could answer "Depends" as well, and my friends kept getting mad that I kept saying that it would depend on the situation. Well, even things that seem clear-cut have gray areas. I think I just mixed my metaphors. That should be either things that are black and white or rough edges. Or something. Whatever. Consider the question about if it's wrong for a man to steal food to feed his starving family. Or Robin Hood. He was a thief, or, was he really just helping to redistribute the wealth? (the "rob from the rich, give to the poor" thing).
Also interesting was the question about having sex with someone who doesn't believe in God. Atheists need some love, too, you know. And we can cry out the Lord's name in vain without fear of repercussion. ;) They could have just kept it at "someone with a different faith."
Anyway, I'm really tired, it's 12:30am and I've been up since 5:30am, so I'm probably going to look back on this tomorrow and be like "wtf was I trying to say? I sound like I'm on crack."